header-logo header-logo

22 October 2009 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7390 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Going up a gear

Will a stricter regime for experts mark the end of forum shopping & increase the level of professionalism? Mark Solon reports

New rules introduced this month require all expert witnesses in civil courts to state they are aware of the legal rules that relate to them. Many experts are unaware of the changes, however, if they do not follow the new regime, their evidence may not be acceptable in court.

Experts have always needed to know their subject area and their duty to the court, but the recent changes to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) have gone a step further. From 1 October, experts will have to include in their reports a statement confirming their awareness of all relevant court rules.

This key change was introduced to address the view that many experts have failed to comply with the existing rules. Solicitors will now need to look for evidence that an expert has an understanding of CPR Pt 35 (Practice Direction and Protocol). It is also likely that if cases go to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll