header-logo header-logo

19 July 2012 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The good, the bad & the ugly

Roger Smith rounds up recent human rights developments

As we limp towards the summer holidays, the secretary of state for justice gives an end of term performance; the party season gets under way; and the Bill of Rights Commission knocks out another consultation.

Clarke in conversation

Ken Clarke was in typical form at a Justice question and answer event. His responses encompassed the good, the bad and the ugly. On the good side, the secretary of state defended the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). He revealed that he had been a bit “iffy” when the idea of the Human Rights Act had originally been mooted but was persuaded by Geoffrey Howe that it was a good idea. He continued to think that HRA 1998 had been wilfully misunderstood by the media and asserted that support was currently coalition policy—which is, as he knows full well, technically correct, though David Cameron and many other Tories are against HRA 1998. On the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll