header-logo header-logo

19 July 2012 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7523 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The good, the bad & the ugly

Roger Smith rounds up recent human rights developments

As we limp towards the summer holidays, the secretary of state for justice gives an end of term performance; the party season gets under way; and the Bill of Rights Commission knocks out another consultation.

Clarke in conversation

Ken Clarke was in typical form at a Justice question and answer event. His responses encompassed the good, the bad and the ugly. On the good side, the secretary of state defended the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998) and the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). He revealed that he had been a bit “iffy” when the idea of the Human Rights Act had originally been mooted but was persuaded by Geoffrey Howe that it was a good idea. He continued to think that HRA 1998 had been wilfully misunderstood by the media and asserted that support was currently coalition policy—which is, as he knows full well, technically correct, though David Cameron and many other Tories are against HRA 1998. On the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll