header-logo header-logo

06 January 2011 / Jane Mayfield
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Good governance

Part two: Jane Mayfield reports on Part II of the Corporate Governance Guidance

In Part II of the guidance the Institute of Directors (IoD) set out 14 governance principles. The IoD’s objective is to suggest a design for the governance framework for an unlisted company in the UK. In implementing the principles a company should exercise common sense ensuring that such framework is both proportionate and specifically tailored to such company.

The 14 principles are split into two phases. The first phase (Principles 1 to 9) applies to all unlisted companies; the second phase (Principles 10 to 14) to larger and more complex unlisted companies including those with significant external financing or aspiring to a public listing.

Principles 1 to 9 provide the core framework of basic governance principles.
Principle 1 states that shareholders should establish an appropriate constitutional and governance framework for the company through its constitutional documents, ie the articles of association, and any shareholders’ agreement. A shareholder needs to consider the existing framework and identify what is required to support the long-term

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll