header-logo header-logo

28 January 2016 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

For the good of the profession

nlj_7684_bindman

A levy on high-earning lawyers: 20 years on & Geoffrey Bindman QC is still waiting

Twenty years ago I failed to persuade my colleagues on the Law Society’s pro bono working party to recommend a levy on high-earning lawyers to supplement public funding. The working party did however accept a compromise: it urged the Society to establish a voluntary fund. When the proposal was put to the big City firms, they turned it down. The Law Society dropped it. The Labour Party later supported a compulsory levy but also dropped it on entering government in 1997.

Jon Robins’s article on the funding crisis reminded me of this history (see “Breaking point”, 165 NLJ 7679, p 7). I do not know if Michael Gove was aware of it when he was appointed as lord chancellor and secretary of state for justice but I am pleased that he has revived the idea of a levy. Soon after he took office he floated it in a lecture which, when reported, again produced

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

NLJ Career Profile: Stephen Ward, The Barrister Group

From mowing lawns to life at the Bar: Stephen Ward reflects on an unconventional career

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Clarke Willmott—Ben Loosemore

Commercial property partner joins Clarke Willmott in Southampton

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Ellisons—Robert Tiffen

Robert Tiffen joins Ellisons as Partner in growing Norwich office

NEWS
The Law Society RFC Festival of Sport returns next month, bringing together legal and financial services professionals for one of the sector’s largest annual sporting events
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

back-to-top-scroll