header-logo header-logo

For the good of the profession

28 January 2016 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail
nlj_7684_bindman

A levy on high-earning lawyers: 20 years on & Geoffrey Bindman QC is still waiting

Twenty years ago I failed to persuade my colleagues on the Law Society’s pro bono working party to recommend a levy on high-earning lawyers to supplement public funding. The working party did however accept a compromise: it urged the Society to establish a voluntary fund. When the proposal was put to the big City firms, they turned it down. The Law Society dropped it. The Labour Party later supported a compulsory levy but also dropped it on entering government in 1997.

Jon Robins’s article on the funding crisis reminded me of this history (see “Breaking point”, 165 NLJ 7679, p 7). I do not know if Michael Gove was aware of it when he was appointed as lord chancellor and secretary of state for justice but I am pleased that he has revived the idea of a levy. Soon after he took office he floated it in a lecture which, when reported, again produced

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll