header-logo header-logo

05 January 2018 / Michael L Nash
Issue: 7775 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Goodbye, hello: an Irish option?

Michael L Nash explores Ireland’s departure from, & possible return to, the Commonwealth

Crises always create opportunities, and the Irish question at the moment, having reached a critical phase, presents just such an opportunity. As Brexit signals one exit, so it may herald another entrance, or re-entrance, of Southern Ireland to the Commonwealth, rising phoenix-like from the ashes of distrust and dispute.

Common history

Membership of any organisation always presents advantages and possibly some disadvantages, as the referendum on membership of the EU shows only too clearly. Membership of the Commonwealth presented just the very same faces to the emerging Irish state between 1920 and 1950, and having been granted Dominion status, it eventually left the Commonwealth under partly unexplained circumstances in 1949.

The Government of Ireland Act 1920 effectively divided Ireland into two, and the Articles of Agreement for the creation of the Irish Free State in 1921 were not to apply to Northern Ireland, but this was never meant to be permanent. It seemed to be the solution

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll