header-logo header-logo

Government Legal Department—Mel Nebhrajani

01 December 2020
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail

New GLD director of litigation

Mel Nebhrajani has been appointed as director of litigation at the Government Legal Department (GLD).

Formerly legal director at the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), in this role Mel advised ministers on NHS, social care and mental health reform, as well as advising the government as it navigates the complex legal issues generated by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Mel takes over the position from her predecessor Stephen Amos, who sadly passed away in June.

She said: ‘Stephen was an exceptionally well-respected and much-loved colleague—he exemplified all that is best about GLD, not least in his respect and support for our colleagues. It is a privilege to build on his important work.

‘I am proud to be leading a team of impressive professionals delivering fascinating and diverse work for the government and to help GLD be profession-leading in all that we do.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll