15 December 2011 / George Walton

Issue: 7494 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law

printer

mail-detail

The great escape?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Is state immunity a “get out of jail” card for sovereign debtors, asks George Walton

The UK Supreme Court gave its landmark decision in July 2011 regarding state immunity in NML Capital Limited (Appellant) v Republic of Argentina (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 31, [2011] All ER (D) 44 (Jul). Unanimously overturning the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court held that Argentina was not entitled to claim state immunity from English proceedings to enforce the judgment of a New York court. The fact that the underlying New York judgment related to bonds issued by a state, in this case Argentina, means that the Supreme Court’s decision is of particular interest and relevance at this time of concern over sovereign debt.

Factual background

In February and July 2000, Argentina conducted a bond issue pursuant to a fiscal agency agreement with Bankers Trust Company (the agreement).

Between June 2001 and September 2003, NML (a Cayman Islands company affiliated to a New York hedge fund) purchased a number of the bonds at a significant discount

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

The great escape?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Is state immunity a “get out of jail” card for sovereign debtors, asks George Walton

The UK Supreme Court gave its landmark decision in July 2011 regarding state immunity in NML Capital Limited (Appellant) v Republic of Argentina (Respondent) [2011] UKSC 31, [2011] All ER (D) 44 (Jul). Unanimously overturning the judgment of the Court of Appeal, the Supreme Court held that Argentina was not entitled to claim state immunity from English proceedings to enforce the judgment of a New York court. The fact that the underlying New York judgment related to bonds issued by a state, in this case Argentina, means that the Supreme Court’s decision is of particular interest and relevance at this time of concern over sovereign debt.

Factual background

In February and July 2000, Argentina conducted a bond issue pursuant to a fiscal agency agreement with Bankers Trust Company (the agreement).

Between June 2001 and September 2003, NML (a Cayman Islands company affiliated to a New York hedge fund) purchased a number of the bonds at a significant discount

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS

NLJ this week: Sanctions ruling casts ‘wide net’ over global finance

A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods

NLJ this week: England’s courts cement status as fraud battleground

Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide

NLJ this week: Mazur ruling puts firms on supervision alert

Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’

NLJ this week: Landlords’ forced entry powers spark legal divide

Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers

NLJ this week: Push to scrap ‘vague’ public office misconduct law

A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence

back-to-top-scroll