header-logo header-logo

Great expectations?

28 July 2011 / Ian McDougall
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Ian McDougall ponders the future of the legal profession

It is fascinating to ponder how the law will develop over coming years. My own retrospective anthology Cases That Changed Our Lives (LexisNexis, 2010) tried to examine the impact of legal changes on the lives of people. But something that often gets overlooked, and therefore has to play “catch-up” as the law moves on, is how the profession of law will change to meet the needs of a changing world? I believe it is a mistake to imagine the law developing without any impact either on, or from, the actual practice of law.

Past developments

The modern law office has been transformed. In the distant past, people employed “scribes” to copy important documents, when the ability to write was a skill in itself. Research was a process of reviewing a mountain of paper; books, periodicals and statutes. An important part of the legal advisor’s skill was the ability to retrieve the relevant area of law. Printing took the place of the scribe and eventually

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll