header-logo header-logo

Great expectations?

28 July 2011 / Ian McDougall
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Ian McDougall ponders the future of the legal profession

It is fascinating to ponder how the law will develop over coming years. My own retrospective anthology Cases That Changed Our Lives (LexisNexis, 2010) tried to examine the impact of legal changes on the lives of people. But something that often gets overlooked, and therefore has to play “catch-up” as the law moves on, is how the profession of law will change to meet the needs of a changing world? I believe it is a mistake to imagine the law developing without any impact either on, or from, the actual practice of law.

Past developments

The modern law office has been transformed. In the distant past, people employed “scribes” to copy important documents, when the ability to write was a skill in itself. Research was a process of reviewing a mountain of paper; books, periodicals and statutes. An important part of the legal advisor’s skill was the ability to retrieve the relevant area of law. Printing took the place of the scribe and eventually

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Clyde & Co—Sian Langer & Gemma Parker

Firm strengthens catastrophic injury capability with partner promotions

DWF—Dean Gormley

DWF—Dean Gormley

Finance and restructuring team offering expands in Manchester with partner hire

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Taylor Rose—Vicki Maflin

Firm announces appointment of head of remortgage

NEWS
The long-awaited Getty Images v Stability AI judgment arrived at the end of last year—but not with the seismic impact many expected. In this week's issue of NLJ, experts from Arnold & Porter dissect a ruling that is ‘historic’ yet tightly confined
The UK Supreme Court may be deciding fewer cases, but its impact in 2025 was anything but muted. In this week's NLJ, Professor Emeritus Brice Dickson of Queen’s University Belfast reviews a year marked by historically low output, a striking rise in jointly authored judgments, and a continued decline in dissent. High-profile rulings on biological sex under the Equality Act, public access to Dartmoor, and fairness in sexual offence trials ensured the court’s voice carried far beyond the Strand
Delays at HM Land Registry are no longer a background irritation but a growing source of professional risk. Writing in NLJ this week, Phil Murrin of DAC Beachcroft explores how the ‘registration gap’—now stretching up to two years in complex cases—is fuelling client frustration, priority disputes, and negligence claims
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
back-to-top-scroll