header-logo header-logo

28 July 2011 / Ian McDougall
Issue: 7476 / Categories: Features , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

Great expectations?

Ian McDougall ponders the future of the legal profession

It is fascinating to ponder how the law will develop over coming years. My own retrospective anthology Cases That Changed Our Lives (LexisNexis, 2010) tried to examine the impact of legal changes on the lives of people. But something that often gets overlooked, and therefore has to play “catch-up” as the law moves on, is how the profession of law will change to meet the needs of a changing world? I believe it is a mistake to imagine the law developing without any impact either on, or from, the actual practice of law.

Past developments

The modern law office has been transformed. In the distant past, people employed “scribes” to copy important documents, when the ability to write was a skill in itself. Research was a process of reviewing a mountain of paper; books, periodicals and statutes. An important part of the legal advisor’s skill was the ability to retrieve the relevant area of law. Printing took the place of the scribe and eventually

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

Bird & Bird—Gordon Moir

London tech and comms team boosted by telecoms and regulatory hires

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll