header-logo header-logo

02 March 2012 / Theo Huckle KC
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Great expectations

Theo Huckle QC calculates future loss of earnings under Ogden 6

The Ogden Tables (6th Edition) —used to calculate future loss of earnings—included a methodology for computing future loss of earnings or earning capacity based upon the gross multiplier for the remainder of the claimant’s working life. They also apply reduction factors to that multiplier which vary according to:

  • whether the claimant had and now has a “disability”;
  • whether the claimant was and now is in employment; and
  • the educational attainments of the claimant.

There is no doubt the computation suggests that the future earning capacity of persons with disabilities is more restricted than has historically been assumed.

Unsurprisingly, judges have concerns in applying the Ogden methodology as to possible overcompensation. Defendants habitually contend a case is not appropriate for the application of that method, urging the court to consider the case one of “too many variables” as in the Blamire line of cases— and thus apply the (cheaper) Smith v Manchester basis of award.

Generally, the courts have shown themselves prepared

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridge strengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll