header-logo header-logo

Great expectations

02 March 2012 / Theo Huckle KC
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Theo Huckle QC calculates future loss of earnings under Ogden 6

The Ogden Tables (6th Edition) —used to calculate future loss of earnings—included a methodology for computing future loss of earnings or earning capacity based upon the gross multiplier for the remainder of the claimant’s working life. They also apply reduction factors to that multiplier which vary according to:

  • whether the claimant had and now has a “disability”;
  • whether the claimant was and now is in employment; and
  • the educational attainments of the claimant.

There is no doubt the computation suggests that the future earning capacity of persons with disabilities is more restricted than has historically been assumed.

Unsurprisingly, judges have concerns in applying the Ogden methodology as to possible overcompensation. Defendants habitually contend a case is not appropriate for the application of that method, urging the court to consider the case one of “too many variables” as in the Blamire line of cases— and thus apply the (cheaper) Smith v Manchester basis of award.

Generally, the courts have shown themselves prepared

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll