header-logo header-logo

02 March 2012 / Theo Huckle KC
Issue: 7503 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Employment
printer mail-detail

Great expectations

Theo Huckle QC calculates future loss of earnings under Ogden 6

The Ogden Tables (6th Edition) —used to calculate future loss of earnings—included a methodology for computing future loss of earnings or earning capacity based upon the gross multiplier for the remainder of the claimant’s working life. They also apply reduction factors to that multiplier which vary according to:

  • whether the claimant had and now has a “disability”;
  • whether the claimant was and now is in employment; and
  • the educational attainments of the claimant.

There is no doubt the computation suggests that the future earning capacity of persons with disabilities is more restricted than has historically been assumed.

Unsurprisingly, judges have concerns in applying the Ogden methodology as to possible overcompensation. Defendants habitually contend a case is not appropriate for the application of that method, urging the court to consider the case one of “too many variables” as in the Blamire line of cases— and thus apply the (cheaper) Smith v Manchester basis of award.

Generally, the courts have shown themselves prepared

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
back-to-top-scroll