header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Grenfell Tower— a different perspective

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
07 July 2017 / Theo Huckle KC
Issue: 7753 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7753_huckle

Theo Huckle QC compares & contrasts the public safety policy agendas of administrations in Westminster & Wales

  • The tragedy of Grenfell Tower highlights how devolution has worked to create different legal provision in many areas of life, including in fire safety of buildings, and suggests that Westminster has something to learn from the recent approach of government in Wales.

Any new-build or refurbished building in England & Wales must comply with the 2010 Building Regulations, with technical requirements set out in Approved Documents to provide a level of flexibility on how the regulations are met (www.gov.uk/government/collections/approved-documents). Approved Document Part B (last updated in 2013 for England) deals with fire safety and covers:

  • means of escape;
  • fire alarms;
  • fire spread, and
  • access for fire and rescue services.

Local authorities are responsible for enforcement and any major work must be regularly checked by Building Control. Fire Safety Authorities are statutory consultees on fire safety under the regulations. In 2007 the UK Government published Buildings Safety and Fire Safety

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Kennedys—Samson Spanier

Commercial disputes practice bolstered by partner hire

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

Bird & Bird—Emma Radcliffe

London competition team expands with collective actions specialist hire

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Hill Dickinson—Chris Williams

Commercial dispute resolution team in London welcomes partner

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: What judging really demands
Judging is ‘more intellectually demanding than any other role in public life’—and far messier than outsiders imagine. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC reflects on decades spent wrestling with unclear legislation, fragile precedent and human fallibility
NLJ this week: AI comes for the billable hour
The long-predicted death of the billable hour may finally be here—and this time, it’s armed with a scythe. In a sweeping critique of time-based billing, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, argues in this week's NLJ that artificial intelligence has made hourly charging ‘intellectually, commercially and ethically indefensible’
NLJ this week: Civil procedure—sharp elbows & sharper warnings
From fake authorities to rent reform, the civil courts have had a busy start to 2026. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold surveys a procedural landscape where guidance, discretion and discipline are all under strain
NLJ this week: Getting the facts right in family courts
Fact-finding hearings remain a fault line in private family law. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors analyse recent appeals exposing the dangers of rushed or fragmented findings
NLJ this week: Sporting justice—at sprint speed
As the Winter Olympics open in Milan and Cortina, legal disputes are once again being resolved almost as fast as the athletes compete. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Ian Blackshaw of Valloni Attorneys examines the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s (CAS's) ad hoc divisions, which can decide cases within 24 hours
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll