header-logo header-logo

07 July 2017 / Theo Huckle KC
Issue: 7753 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Grenfell Tower— a different perspective

nlj_7753_huckle

Theo Huckle QC compares & contrasts the public safety policy agendas of administrations in Westminster & Wales

  • The tragedy of Grenfell Tower highlights how devolution has worked to create different legal provision in many areas of life, including in fire safety of buildings, and suggests that Westminster has something to learn from the recent approach of government in Wales.

Any new-build or refurbished building in England & Wales must comply with the 2010 Building Regulations, with technical requirements set out in Approved Documents to provide a level of flexibility on how the regulations are met (www.gov.uk/government/collections/approved-documents). Approved Document Part B (last updated in 2013 for England) deals with fire safety and covers:

  • means of escape;
  • fire alarms;
  • fire spread, and
  • access for fire and rescue services.

Local authorities are responsible for enforcement and any major work must be regularly checked by Building Control. Fire Safety Authorities are statutory consultees on fire safety under the regulations. In 2007 the UK Government published Buildings Safety and Fire Safety

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll