header-logo header-logo

Grenfell Tower— a different perspective

07 July 2017 / Theo Huckle KC
Issue: 7753 / Categories: Features , Health & safety , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7753_huckle

Theo Huckle QC compares & contrasts the public safety policy agendas of administrations in Westminster & Wales

  • The tragedy of Grenfell Tower highlights how devolution has worked to create different legal provision in many areas of life, including in fire safety of buildings, and suggests that Westminster has something to learn from the recent approach of government in Wales.

Any new-build or refurbished building in England & Wales must comply with the 2010 Building Regulations, with technical requirements set out in Approved Documents to provide a level of flexibility on how the regulations are met (www.gov.uk/government/collections/approved-documents). Approved Document Part B (last updated in 2013 for England) deals with fire safety and covers:

  • means of escape;
  • fire alarms;
  • fire spread, and
  • access for fire and rescue services.

Local authorities are responsible for enforcement and any major work must be regularly checked by Building Control. Fire Safety Authorities are statutory consultees on fire safety under the regulations. In 2007 the UK Government published Buildings Safety and Fire Safety

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll