header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
12 April 2024 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Public , In Court
printer mail-detail

Greta Thunberg: assembling peacefully?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
167824
The Swedish activist pleaded not guilty to a public order offence—and the court agreed. Neil Parpworth explains the ruling
  • Covers the events on 17 October 2023, which resulted in Thunberg’s arrest.
  • Discusses the wider context of offences under s 14 of the Public Order Act 1986, and the way they have evolved.
  • Despite the widening of police powers, this particular ruling reflects a non-deferential approach to police decisions, which must be upheld in order to protect ECHR freedoms.

The environmental campaigner Greta Thunberg was recently found not guilty by Westminster Magistrates’ Court of a public order offence in relation to a protest by Greenpeace and Fossil Free London activists outside the InterContinental London Park Lane hotel in Mayfair, which took place on 17 October 2023. Inside the hotel, oil executives had been participating in a three-day event, the Energy Intelligence Forum, which explains why the protestors were chanting and holding banners reading: ‘Oily money out’ and ‘Make polluters pay.’

At her trial, Thunberg pleaded not guilty to an offence alleged

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Read All
‘Lost years’ precedent overturned
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
NLJ this week: Neutral counsel in a polarised age
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
NLJ this week: Short lets & sharp covenants
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
NLJ this week: Justice at the algorithm’s edge
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
NLJ this week: When ‘milk’ really means milk
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll