header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Greta Thunberg: assembling peacefully?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
12 April 2024 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 8066 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Public , In Court
printer mail-detail
167824
The Swedish activist pleaded not guilty to a public order offence—and the court agreed. Neil Parpworth explains the ruling
  • Covers the events on 17 October 2023, which resulted in Thunberg’s arrest.
  • Discusses the wider context of offences under s 14 of the Public Order Act 1986, and the way they have evolved.
  • Despite the widening of police powers, this particular ruling reflects a non-deferential approach to police decisions, which must be upheld in order to protect ECHR freedoms.

The environmental campaigner Greta Thunberg was recently found not guilty by Westminster Magistrates’ Court of a public order offence in relation to a protest by Greenpeace and Fossil Free London activists outside the InterContinental London Park Lane hotel in Mayfair, which took place on 17 October 2023. Inside the hotel, oil executives had been participating in a three-day event, the Energy Intelligence Forum, which explains why the protestors were chanting and holding banners reading: ‘Oily money out’ and ‘Make polluters pay.’

At her trial, Thunberg pleaded not guilty to an offence alleged

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Myers & Co—Jen Goodwin

Head of corporate promoted to director

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Boies Schiller Flexner—Lindsay Reimschussel

Firm strengthens international arbitration team with key London hire

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Making Big Tech pay for digital addiction
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
NLJ this week: Leaseholders stuck in limbo
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
NLJ this week: When a trial period becomes a ‘reasonable adjustment’
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
NLJ this week: Ignore covenants at your peril
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
NLJ this week: Courts caught in a ‘hierarchy of privacy’
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll