header-logo header-logo

Groundbreaking ruling

30 October 2008
Issue: 7343 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Contempt of court

In a landmark case, five British special forces soldiers have succeeded in obtaining a court order preventing their identities being published.

According to solicitoradvocate Paul Bennett, of Gwilym Hughes & Partners, who acted for the defendants in Times Newspapers Ltd and others, this is the first known case in England and Wales that the prosecution and defence have worked together to secure an order of this type, and the first time a court has upheld a defendant’s right to anonymity. The five soldiers, who denied charges of conspiracy to defraud, have since been acquitted.
 

Issue: 7343 / Categories: Legal News , Data protection
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll