header-logo header-logo

Group litigation orders: sharing the spotlight

01 August 2019 / Gavin Foggo , Andrew Hill
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Features , Profession , Company
printer mail-detail

Group litigation orders offer a pragmatic solution to the Australian ‘beauty parade’ trend in shareholder class actions, explain Gavin Foggo & Andrew Hill

  • When more than one group of claimants has formed in Australia, the court’s approach has increasingly been to conduct a ‘beauty parade’ to determine which one group proceeds.
  • This ignores a claimant’s right to choose its own solicitors and fund its litigation how it sees fit; the UK’s group litigation order regime provides a solution to this.

According to HM Courts & Tribunals Service, there have been 105 group litigation orders (GLOs) made in proceedings since the introduction of the GLO into the Civil Procedure Rules on 2 May 2000. The list is not entirely comprehensive, but the bulk of these GLOs have been made in disparate—although mainly consumer-focused—areas such as product liability claims, tax disputes, environmental claims, and industrial disease claims, with the most recent being made in the VW NOx Emissions Group litigation (date of order: 11 May 2018). Only a few, so far, have

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll