header-logo header-logo

27 April 2007 / Khawar Qureshi KC
Issue: 7270 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Growing up fast

In the first of two articles marking 10 years of the Arbitration Act 1996, Khawar Qureshi QC discusses some key cases

A case search will show that there are almost 400 publicly available decisions to consider which involve the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996). There are in fact likely to be more court decisions, as some will be clothed with confidentiality where the parties have agreed for this and there is no overriding public interest to the contrary.

However, before jumping to the tempting conclusion that this indicates excessive scope for intervention by the English courts, one must bear in mind that not all these decisions will have involved challenges to the arbitral process. Some will have sought anti-suit injunctions to uphold a choice of arbitration or assistance for the arbitral process by some other means from the court.

Indeed, the clear message from all the key cases, most of which have been decided in the past couple of years, is that the choice of arbitration is being strongly supported by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll