header-logo header-logo

10 January 2008
Issue: 7303 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

Hair Extensions

News In Brief

Solicitors and other non-barrister advocates authorised under the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990 can wear wigs in court, following a practice direction on court dress handed down by the lord chief justice. As of 2 January 2008, advocates can wear wigs wherever members of the Bar would ordinarily be allowed to do so, including the crown, county and magistrates’ courts. The move follows a consultation carried out by the Department for Constitutional Affairs and consultation with the heads of division. Law Society president Andrew Holroyd says: “We are delighted that the current unjustified disadvantage to solicitor-advocates has ended.”

Issue: 7303 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

NLJ Career Profile: Mark Hastings, Quillon Law

Mark Hastings, founding partner of Quillon Law, on turning dreams into reality and pushing back on preconceptions about partnership

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

Kingsley Napley—Silvia Devecchi

New family law partner for Italian and international clients appointed

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Mishcon de Reya—Susannah Kintish

Firm elects new chair of tier 1 ranked employment department

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll