header-logo header-logo

Half-baked reforms

17 May 2007 / David Burrows
Issue: 7273 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

David Burrows reports from the legal aid family law barricades

On 1 May 2007 the House of Commons Constitutional Affairs Select Committee published its report, Implementation of the Carter Review of Legal Aid, which the Law Society characterises as mirroring its own concerns and Resolution describes as “right on the money”.

By what criteria should the report be judged? Not first by the pocket of the lawyer. First must be the needs of the public, the people we advise and assist. We must be able to do so to a standard where clients are guaranteed a service of a good and, where need be, expert standard. But if that is not paid for then the lawyer will look elsewhere for his work: if you do not pay your dentist, builder, surgeon or plumber enough they won’t work for you. Reduce pay to subsistence levels and you get subsistence service; and your drains or your heart won’t work for long.

labour ideas

The story so far is that early in Tony Blair’s first term his former

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll