header-logo header-logo

Handling the critics

06 November 2015 / Peter Causton
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Peter Causton examines the new mediation regime for handling complaints against lawyers

From 1 October 2015 there is a new way of dealing with complaints about lawyers: Mediation. All legal service providers, including solicitors and barristers, in the UK must offer consumers an independent certified alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provider to deal with any contractual disputes, following the conclusion of the internal complaints process. This can include mediation. The new rules coincide with the introduction of the new Consumer Rights Act 2015, which provides new grounds for complaint against professionals.

For lawyers, they might have been forgiven for thinking that their obligations stop when they have provided their clients with details of the statutory complaints body, the legal ombudsman and their internal complaints procedure, but in fact lawyers need to provide details of a certified ADR provider as well.

Complaints handling

The Solicitors’ Code of Conduct sets out the requirements for complaints handling, including having a written complaints procedure which: (a) is brought to clients’ attention at the outset of the matter; (b) is easy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll