header-logo header-logo

Handling the critics

06 November 2015 / Peter Causton
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Peter Causton examines the new mediation regime for handling complaints against lawyers

From 1 October 2015 there is a new way of dealing with complaints about lawyers: Mediation. All legal service providers, including solicitors and barristers, in the UK must offer consumers an independent certified alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provider to deal with any contractual disputes, following the conclusion of the internal complaints process. This can include mediation. The new rules coincide with the introduction of the new Consumer Rights Act 2015, which provides new grounds for complaint against professionals.

For lawyers, they might have been forgiven for thinking that their obligations stop when they have provided their clients with details of the statutory complaints body, the legal ombudsman and their internal complaints procedure, but in fact lawyers need to provide details of a certified ADR provider as well.

Complaints handling

The Solicitors’ Code of Conduct sets out the requirements for complaints handling, including having a written complaints procedure which: (a) is brought to clients’ attention at the outset of the matter; (b) is easy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll