header-logo header-logo

Handling the critics

06 November 2015 / Peter Causton
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Peter Causton examines the new mediation regime for handling complaints against lawyers

From 1 October 2015 there is a new way of dealing with complaints about lawyers: Mediation. All legal service providers, including solicitors and barristers, in the UK must offer consumers an independent certified alternative dispute resolution (ADR) provider to deal with any contractual disputes, following the conclusion of the internal complaints process. This can include mediation. The new rules coincide with the introduction of the new Consumer Rights Act 2015, which provides new grounds for complaint against professionals.

For lawyers, they might have been forgiven for thinking that their obligations stop when they have provided their clients with details of the statutory complaints body, the legal ombudsman and their internal complaints procedure, but in fact lawyers need to provide details of a certified ADR provider as well.

Complaints handling

The Solicitors’ Code of Conduct sets out the requirements for complaints handling, including having a written complaints procedure which: (a) is brought to clients’ attention at the outset of the matter; (b) is easy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll