header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Happy anniversary? 30 years of the Children Act

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
28 November 2019 / David Burrows
Issue: 7866 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail
12253
On the 30th anniversary of the Children Act, David Burrows reflects on the state of children’s rights
  • Legal developments in the run up to the Children Act 1989.
  • Birth of the Children Act 1989.
  • Listening to children.
  • A case about children’s rights.
  • Children’s rights in 2019: thirty years on from Children Act 1989.

The Children Act 1989 (CA 1989) received Royal Assent on 16 November 1989 (in force from October 1991). Its thirtieth anniversary is upon us. It was a statute which required all courts, social workers and practising children lawyers (a breed which at the time was only just emerging) to learn a new set of legal concepts.

This article looks specifically at children’s rights under the Act in those thirty years. Central to this is the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989. Its Art 12.1 says: ‘1 States Parties shall assure to the child who is capable of forming his or her own views the right to express

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Kingsley Napley—Paul Davidoff

Partner joins as lead of international tax desk

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

Reed Smith—Michael Darowski

International arbitration partner joins disputes team in London

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Shakespeare Martineau — 12 newly qualified solicitors

Firm celebrates strong retention and new talent across practice areas

NEWS
Read All
Long wait ahead for improvement in parental leave
MPs have expressed disappointment after the government confirmed it will not consider updating the parental leave system until at least 2027
NLJ this week: Righting Libor wrongs
In July, the Supreme Court quashed the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, ruling that trial judges had wrongly directed juries to treat profit-motivated Libor submissions as inherently dishonest. In this week’s NLJ, David Stern and James Fletcher of 5 St Andrew’s Hill reflect on the decision
NLJ this week: Back to (costs) basics
David Bailey-Vella of Davis Woolfe and chair of the Association of Costs Lawyers explores the new costs budgeting light pilot scheme in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Gaslighting & post-separation assets
In this week's issue of NLJ, Emma Brunning and Dharshica Thanarajasingham of Birketts unpack the high-conflict financial remedy case TF v SF [2025] EWHC 1659 (Fam). The husband’s conduct—described by the judge as a ‘masterclass in gaslighting’—included hiding a £9.5m deferred payment from the sale of a port acquired post-separation. Despite his claims that the port was non-matrimonial, the court found its value rooted in marital assets and efforts
NLJ this week: Lord Neuberger on assisted dying
Lord Neuberger, former president of the Supreme Court, shares his views on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in this week's NLJ with William Raven
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll