header-logo header-logo

Hard to predict

22 April 2010 / Seamus Smyth
Issue: 7414 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Seamus Smyth outlines the difficulty of envisaging future trends in litigation

We’ve already seen an increasing obligation to “price” work in advance; the agglomeration of practices into bigger law firms on cost grounds with the inevitable concentration in larger centres; and—courtesy of instant communications—because we can respond immediately, a growing belief that we must respond immediately, with all the dangers inherent in doing so.
The fundamental issues, though, revolve around the cost of litigation and access to justice. Costs appear to be increasing rapidly in absolute terms and in relation to amounts at stake. Consequently, access to justice is being reduced: where the costs and risk of adverse costs deter litigants from properly making or defending claims they are being failed by the state.

The state provides a dispute resolution system. Our system works well—cost aside —producing good results generally and is respected worldwide. For disputes with large amounts at stake costs are less of a problem but for most cases, where value ranges from small claims to those worth tens (even low hundreds) of thousands

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll