header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
02 March 2018 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Harsh repayment terms

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7783_dobson

Nicholas Dobson examines the scenario of unlawful prison for council tax default

  • The regime for enforcement of non-payment of council tax was not systemically unfair and unlawful.

  • However, magistrates and authorities need to have careful regard to material statutory requirements.

Local authorities provide local governance, functions and services by statute. Many aim to be customer-friendly bodies in the manner of various private providers. However, there is a significant difference between local authority and private services. For with commercial firms, consumers can choose what and whether to buy and from whom. However, local authorities as monopoly providers of core functions, demand payment of council tax whether or not anyone liable for it uses or benefits from any of their services. Furthermore, failure to pay can result in statutory recovery options including (in the case of wilful refusal or culpable neglect) commitment to prison for up to three months.

Prison is of course a harsh recovery sanction and a January 2017 judicial review decision illustrated where magistrates’ courts and authorities can go wrong in imposing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Mazur and more—inside the litigation frontline

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

NLJ this week: Social media bans for children spark legal dilemmas
Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
NLJ this week: Leasehold reform risks creating ‘forgotten freeholders’
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
NLJ this week: Court of Appeal clarifies when a claim truly begins
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
NLJ this week: Split FDRs could ease pressure—and boost settlements
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll