header-logo header-logo

Harsh repayment terms

02 March 2018 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail
nlj_7783_dobson

Nicholas Dobson examines the scenario of unlawful prison for council tax default

  • The regime for enforcement of non-payment of council tax was not systemically unfair and unlawful.

  • However, magistrates and authorities need to have careful regard to material statutory requirements.

Local authorities provide local governance, functions and services by statute. Many aim to be customer-friendly bodies in the manner of various private providers. However, there is a significant difference between local authority and private services. For with commercial firms, consumers can choose what and whether to buy and from whom. However, local authorities as monopoly providers of core functions, demand payment of council tax whether or not anyone liable for it uses or benefits from any of their services. Furthermore, failure to pay can result in statutory recovery options including (in the case of wilful refusal or culpable neglect) commitment to prison for up to three months.

Prison is of course a harsh recovery sanction and a January 2017 judicial review decision illustrated where magistrates’ courts and authorities can go wrong in imposing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll