header-logo header-logo

04 February 2016
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Health & safety fine levels soar for UK plc

New sentencing guidelines represent “sea change” in health & safety law

Health and safety fines are soaring, with four UK companies incurring fines of more than £1m in the space of six days in January.

Fines of £4.8m were imposed between 21 and 26 January 2016. Meanwhile, tough new sentencing guidelines for health and safety and corporate manslaughter took effect on 1 February. Under the guidelines, large UK companies face unlimited fines with a starting point of £7.5m on organisations with a turnover of more than £50m, for corporate manslaughter. Smaller organisations with a turnover of up to £2m could face a fine of £450,000 or more.

Last month, C.RO Ports London Ltd was fined £1.8m following an incident where an employee caught his arm in a rotating machine. National Grid Gas plc was fined £1m after an engineer became trapped between two gas pipes. Balfour Beatty was fined £1m after a fatal crane incident. UK Power Networks (Operations) Ltd was fined £1m following the death of a runner who was electrocuted by a low-hanging high voltage power cable.

Gerard Forlin QC, of Cornerstone Barristers, who told NLJ in November that the new guidelines would “send a chill through corporate UK”, says: “Many parties may well have been trying to get cases to court before the guillotine date of 1 February 2016 heralding the new guidelines. The above listed fines appear to be a barometer or precursor of what is to come.

“Fine levels (and terms of imprisonment) are set to explode, and will inevitably lead to more trials. For those cases where guilty pleas will be entered, complicated preliminary hearings dealing with culpability bandings and turnover utilising experts will become the norm. Only time will tell, but how easily will courts be able to manage these additional, potentially lengthy hearings in already clogged up calendars? These guidelines represent a real challenge to everyone concerned.”

Danny McShee, partner at Kennedys, says: “The new sentencing guidelines represent a sea change in health and safety law. We anticipate that as the courts become familiar with the guidelines over the coming months, we will be increasingly advising corporate clients that they face a level of fine which, until very recently, would have been almost unfathomable.”

Issue: 7685 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll