header-logo header-logo

Hidden fees on retirement flats

05 November 2015
Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Law Commission has launched a consultation into “leasehold event fees”, which often leave owners of retirement flats and their families with a hefty, unexpected bill.

The fees, which are typically set at around 1% of the property sale price but may be as high as 30%, allow older people with a low income to defer the running costs of their flats until the property is sold. However, the owners are shocked at how high the fee is when they sell.

The Law Commission consultation, Residential leases: fees on transfer of title, change of occupancy and other events, asks: should developers, landlords, managing agents and estate agents do more to make potential buyers aware of event fees; and can this be achieved through industry codes of practice?

Stephen Lewis, Law Commissioner, says: “Older people are able to live independently in specialist retirement housing thanks to its design and the services provided on site. There are good reasons why they might want to defer some of the associated costs, and pay an event fee when the property is sold. But too many people are being taken by surprise by hidden event fees.”

Issue: 7675 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll