header-logo header-logo

23 October 2014
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

High Court: Pirate websites can be blocked

The High Court has jurisdiction to stop internet service providers (ISP) allowing access to websites that breach trade mark rights by selling counterfeit goods, it has held, in the first case of its type.

The case, Cartier International and Others vs BSkyB and others [2014] EWHC 3354 (Ch), concerned the trade mark rights of Richemont, owner of luxury brands such as Cartier and Mont Blanc. Richemont selected sites that wholly infringed its trade marks and sought an injunction against an ISP to block access.

The question arose of whether the High Court had jurisdiction to grant an injunction—the court held that it did.

Jeremy Blum, partner at Bristows, says: “This decision is a real development for brand owners in fighting online counterfeiting.

“Since L’Oreal v eBay and the recent s 97A copyright cases it was generally viewed that trade mark owners ought to be able to obtain an injunction against an ISP intermediary to block access to websites that infringe trade mark rights, and this is the first decision confirming the UK courts have jurisdiction to grant such an injunction as well as setting out the principles to be applied in determining if an injunction should be made.

“Broadly whether an injunction against an intermediary should be made, the court must assess whether the injunction is proportionate, effective, dissuasive and not a barrier to legitimate trade. The interesting point in future will be the range of websites that will be able to be blocked; for example this case involved websites wholly engaged in infringing activity.”

Issue: 7627 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll