header-logo header-logo

Hill Dickinson—James Lonsdale & Raj Pabla

06 October 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Law firm appoints two partners to business services group

Law firm Hill Dickinson has appointed two new partners as it prepares to expand its commercial litigation and commercial, TMT and IP practices within the firm’s business services group offering.

James Lonsdale and Raj Pabla join the firm’s Manchester and London offices respectively.

James Lonsdale, a commercial lawyer, joins from DWF as partner in Hill Dickinson’s Manchester TMT and IP team.

James has over 25 years of experience of advising a wide variety of clients on a range of different commercial arrangements including supply, distribution, agency agreements, IP acquisition and licensing, IT and outsourcing arrangements. His experience spans a broad range of sectors including IT, telecoms, retail and manufacturing and he has acted for a wide variety of clients, from startups to large listed companies.

Raj Pabla (pictured) joins Hill Dickinson commercial litigation team in London (City) as a lateral hire from London law firm Teacher Stern, where he spent the last 13 years, becoming a partner in 2014.

His arrival at Hill Dickinson adds capacity to the firm’s plans to boost its national commercial litigation team with further senior level capacity in London. Further hires are due to be announced by the end of the year.

Raj manages a broad commercial litigation practice for clients from a diverse range of business sectors, including real estate, IT, sports and media, fashion, banking and travel, fintech and finance. His key areas of work include corporate and shareholder disputes, civil fraud, debt and asset recovery, disputes arising out corporate transactions and commercial contract claims. He also practices in several fields of professional liability with particular emphasis on claims against lawyers, financial institutions and advisors, surveyors, and architects.

Welcoming James and Raj to the firm, Craig Scott, Hill Dickinson’s head of business services, said: 'Sustainable profitable growth over the past few years in line with our strategic plan for expansion in our key markets in London and across our regional centres has opened up opportunities for us to invest in further expanding our senior legal teams in key practice areas. I am delighted to welcome James and Raj to Hill Dickinson as highly regarded experts in their respective areas of specialism, reflecting our commitment to providing excellence across the full range of business services to our clients across the UK and internationally.'

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll