header-logo header-logo

Hill Dickinson—legal director promotions

19 May 2022
Categories: Movers & Shakers , Profession
printer mail-detail
Commercial law firm announces legal director promotions

Hill Dickinson has begun its new financial year by announcing the promotion of 11 of its senior associates to legal director. The promotions are effective from 1 May 2022 and centre on the firm’s three largest UK offices, in Liverpool, London and Manchester.

Spanning all three of Hill Dickinson’s key business groups—Business Services, Marine and Health—the 11 new legal directors cover a range of practice areas, including corporate, real estate, employment, private client health advisory, health litigation and shipping.

Three of the promotions are in the Liverpool office, six in London and two in Manchester.

Congratulating them on their new roles in the firm, Hill Dickinson chief executive Peter Jackson said: 'It gives me great pleasure to support our people in building their careers with Hill Dickinson and see their efforts rewarded by promotion through the ranks.

'These 11 individuals have worked tremendously hard to make their mark within their respective practice area teams and have very bright futures ahead of them. In promoting them to legal director we acknowledge their contribution to the success of our firm and share their pride in becoming senior lawyers at Hill Dickinson. I am delighted to congratulate them all.

'Our growth strategy and aims in respect of gender balance are deliberately steady. This promotions round, as for the past few years, has seen greater numbers of female lawyers coming through, which means we’re steadily improving our balance at senior levels while preserving the culture we’ve worked so hard to maintain.'

The full list of promotions is:

Business Services Group

NamePractice TeamLocation
Rebecca Layton (pictured, top row, far right)CorporateLiverpool
Emma McIntosh (pictured, middle row, far left)Real EstateLondon
Louise McMahon (pictured, middle row, centre)Real EstateLondon
Joe Orme (pictured, top row, centre)EmploymentLiverpool
Rajveer Sehmi (pictured, middle row, far right)CorporateLondon
Will Steed (pictured, bottom row, far left)EmploymentLondon
Alison Batchelor (pictured, top row, far left)Real EstateManchester
Katie Austin (pictured, top row, second from the right)Private ClientLiverpool

 

Marine Business Group

Trudie Protopapas (pictured, bottom row, centre)ShippingLondon

Health Business Group

Rohana Abeywardana (pictured, bottom row, centre)Health LitigationLondon
Sion Davies (pictured, top row, second from the left)Health AdvisoryManchester

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll