header-logo header-logo

27 April 2016
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Hillsborough: unlawful killing

Longest inquest in British legal history concludes 27 years after tragedy

The 96 Liverpool football fans crushed to death during the April 1989 Hillsborough disaster were unlawfully killed, the jury at the two-year inquest has concluded.

The jury were tasked with 14 questions about the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest, which ended in tragedy. They found that the fans were unlawfully killed; David Duckenfield, the former chief superintendent in charge of policing the match, was guilty of gross negligence; there were “major omissions” in the operational order of the game; there were errors by the ambulance service; and Liverpool fans were not to blame.

The jury reached a majority verdict about unlawful killing and were unanimous on the police pre-game planning, stadium safety and the emergency services’ response. They criticised the “slow and uncoordinated” police response and ruled that officers should have closed a tunnel leading to the overcrowded area before ordering an exit gate to be opened.

Criminal investigations into allegations of a police cover-up to shift blame on to the fans are ongoing. The initial inquests ruled that the deaths were accidental, but these were quashed following the 2012 Hillsborough Independent Panel report after families battled for decades to have the truth exposed.

The Crown Prosecution Service is considering whether to bring further criminal charges.

In a joint statement, Elkan Abrahamson, partner at QS Jackson Canter, and Marcia Willis-Stewart, partner at Birnberg Peirce & Partners, representing the Hillsborough Justice Campaign and the Hillsborough Family Support Group, said the jury’s conclusions “completely vindicate the family’s long fight for justice”.

“It is therefore all the more shameful that, rather than focusing on the search for truth and despite having made public apologies, the approach to the inquests taken by South Yorkshire police and the Yorkshire ambulance service was to fight tooth and nail to avoid adverse findings by the jury; this turned the Inquests into an adversarial battle that probably doubled the length of time it might otherwise have done,” they said.

“There is, however, still a long road to travel; the recent investigations have already taken 3 years and we therefore now urge the authorities to conduct rigorous and speedy investigations which will lead to criminal and disciplinary proceedings and to the attribution of final and full accountability.”

They said the families had shown “a constant and enduring tenacity and dedication to exposing the truth which has, despite all attempts to derail the process, stood firm over the decades”.

 

Issue: 7696 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll