header-logo header-logo

27 April 2016
Issue: 7696 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Hillsborough: unlawful killing

Longest inquest in British legal history concludes 27 years after tragedy

The 96 Liverpool football fans crushed to death during the April 1989 Hillsborough disaster were unlawfully killed, the jury at the two-year inquest has concluded.

The jury were tasked with 14 questions about the FA Cup semi-final between Liverpool and Nottingham Forest, which ended in tragedy. They found that the fans were unlawfully killed; David Duckenfield, the former chief superintendent in charge of policing the match, was guilty of gross negligence; there were “major omissions” in the operational order of the game; there were errors by the ambulance service; and Liverpool fans were not to blame.

The jury reached a majority verdict about unlawful killing and were unanimous on the police pre-game planning, stadium safety and the emergency services’ response. They criticised the “slow and uncoordinated” police response and ruled that officers should have closed a tunnel leading to the overcrowded area before ordering an exit gate to be opened.

Criminal investigations into allegations of a police cover-up to shift blame on to the fans are ongoing. The initial inquests ruled that the deaths were accidental, but these were quashed following the 2012 Hillsborough Independent Panel report after families battled for decades to have the truth exposed.

The Crown Prosecution Service is considering whether to bring further criminal charges.

In a joint statement, Elkan Abrahamson, partner at QS Jackson Canter, and Marcia Willis-Stewart, partner at Birnberg Peirce & Partners, representing the Hillsborough Justice Campaign and the Hillsborough Family Support Group, said the jury’s conclusions “completely vindicate the family’s long fight for justice”.

“It is therefore all the more shameful that, rather than focusing on the search for truth and despite having made public apologies, the approach to the inquests taken by South Yorkshire police and the Yorkshire ambulance service was to fight tooth and nail to avoid adverse findings by the jury; this turned the Inquests into an adversarial battle that probably doubled the length of time it might otherwise have done,” they said.

“There is, however, still a long road to travel; the recent investigations have already taken 3 years and we therefore now urge the authorities to conduct rigorous and speedy investigations which will lead to criminal and disciplinary proceedings and to the attribution of final and full accountability.”

They said the families had shown “a constant and enduring tenacity and dedication to exposing the truth which has, despite all attempts to derail the process, stood firm over the decades”.

 

Issue: 7696 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll