header-logo header-logo

10 February 2012 / Felicia Epstein
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

On hold?

hires_1_4

When should junior court proceedings be stayed in favour of the High Court, asks Felicia Epstein

There are two sets of civil proceedings between the same parties, one in the High Court and the other in a more junior civil court or tribunal. In what circumstances should the more junior court stay the case before it in favour of the High Court proceedings? And should it take a different approach if High Court proceedings have been threatened but not yet issued? These questions have been considered by the same Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) judge in two different cases.

Mindimaxnox

In Mindimaxnox LLP v Gover & Ho (2010) UKEAT/0225/DA, [2011] All ER (D) 146 (May), HHJ McMullen QC explored the factors which an employment tribunal should consider when deciding whether to stay the employment tribunal proceedings in favour of proceedings between the same parties in the High Court. His conclusions may be summarised in six principles:

(i) It is not the case that simply because there are complex factual matters the employment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll