header-logo header-logo

10 February 2012 / Felicia Epstein
Issue: 7500 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

On hold?

hires_1_4

When should junior court proceedings be stayed in favour of the High Court, asks Felicia Epstein

There are two sets of civil proceedings between the same parties, one in the High Court and the other in a more junior civil court or tribunal. In what circumstances should the more junior court stay the case before it in favour of the High Court proceedings? And should it take a different approach if High Court proceedings have been threatened but not yet issued? These questions have been considered by the same Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) judge in two different cases.

Mindimaxnox

In Mindimaxnox LLP v Gover & Ho (2010) UKEAT/0225/DA, [2011] All ER (D) 146 (May), HHJ McMullen QC explored the factors which an employment tribunal should consider when deciding whether to stay the employment tribunal proceedings in favour of proceedings between the same parties in the High Court. His conclusions may be summarised in six principles:

(i) It is not the case that simply because there are complex factual matters the employment

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll