header-logo header-logo

Home (working) & Away

15 October 2020 / Juliet Carp
Issue: 7906 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Employment , Profession
printer mail-detail
29199
Working at home from abroad—what should employers, employees & their lawyers know? Juliet Carp identifies some of the legal pitfalls & offers some practical suggestions

In brief

  • Challenges of homeworking abroad: first stop immigration.
  • What should a diligent employer do? Global mobility compliance.
  • Where do lawyers come in? Recognising limits.

A lot has been written about homeworking and most of it applies equally to people working ‘virtually’ from abroad. After all, if you are working from home via the internet does it really make a difference if your home happens to be somewhere sunnier or closer to family overseas? The short answer is ‘Yes, it does!’. Extra compliance challenges and costs can be very substantial indeed. While it may make sense to address these when making a strategic decision to move into new markets, it rarely makes commercial sense for one individual who would simply prefer to be somewhere different.

Challenges

So, what are these challenges? First stop immigration, because without immigration compliance, both employee and employer (and sometimes

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll