header-logo header-logo

04 September 2009 / Thomas Duggins
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Homing in on the recession

Property prices are affecting FDR payouts, Thomas Duggins finds

The former matrimonial home is often a couple’s most valuable asset and will form the core of negotiations surrounding the division of marital capital. After the boom years, the recent turmoil in the housing market presents new obstacles when dealing with the matrimonial home in settlement negotiations.

Valuation

The value of the former matrimonial home must be established before negotiations can begin on whether it is to be retained by one party or sold and the proceeds divided. Even if the property is to be retained by one spouse, the courts require an appraisal of value so that an assessment can be made as to the fairness of the financial settlement (H v H [2008] EWHC 935 (Fam), [2008] All ER (D) 415 (Apr)).

Form E requires the parties to provide a valuation obtained in the last six months, or their own “realistic estimate of the current market value”. It is sensible to invite three local agents to view the property and provide

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll