header-logo header-logo

04 September 2009 / Thomas Duggins
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Homing in on the recession

Property prices are affecting FDR payouts, Thomas Duggins finds

The former matrimonial home is often a couple’s most valuable asset and will form the core of negotiations surrounding the division of marital capital. After the boom years, the recent turmoil in the housing market presents new obstacles when dealing with the matrimonial home in settlement negotiations.

Valuation

The value of the former matrimonial home must be established before negotiations can begin on whether it is to be retained by one party or sold and the proceeds divided. Even if the property is to be retained by one spouse, the courts require an appraisal of value so that an assessment can be made as to the fairness of the financial settlement (H v H [2008] EWHC 935 (Fam), [2008] All ER (D) 415 (Apr)).

Form E requires the parties to provide a valuation obtained in the last six months, or their own “realistic estimate of the current market value”. It is sensible to invite three local agents to view the property and provide

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll