header-logo header-logo

Honour-based abuse— a dose of reality

14 January 2022 / Imran Khodabocus
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Features , Family , Criminal
printer mail-detail
68400
Imran Khodabocus reports on the rise in honour-based abuse cases, and reflects on the similarities and differences with domestic abuse
  • Figures show rise in honour-based abuse with West Midlands, Thames Valley and Metropolitan Police reporting highest rates.
  • The wider impact of this abuse and what lawyers can do to help victims.

What defines honour-based abuse? The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) describes it as ‘an incident or crime which has or may have been committed to protect or defend the honour of the family and/or community’.

The common theme in such cases is control. Where a spouse, usually a husband, dictates the lives of their partner and/or children. The issues of honour and the resulting control and violence are not limited to one particular culture, but a broad range.

New figures gleaned from national police forces show there has been a huge rise in honour-based abuse with offences rising by 74% in five years. Between 2016 and 2020 the number of violent honour-based abuse cases rose from 884 to 1,539.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll