header-logo header-logo

07 April 2010
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

In-house holds power as magic circle hits downward spiral

In-house counsel have gained prestige within their companies as a result of recession-led changes to the legal sector, while Magic Circle firms have lost status.

The long-established practice of hourly billing is giving way to value billing, with firms offering freebies such as free-of-charge secondees to keep value-conscious clients on board.

A report, Law firm of the 21st century—The clients’ revolution, commissioned by international law firm Eversheds, warns law firms that that they need to modernise or lose out as a major power shift is taking place in favour of the in-house client.

The report canvassed the opinions of 130 General Counsel and 80 law firm partners around the world, with just over half (51%) of clients and 46% of partners citing the term, “Magic Circle”, as defunct.

The overwhelming majority of clients and partners said they welcomed the change to the traditional law firm hierarchy.

In-house counsel have gained status—three-quarters of General Counsel said they occupied a more senior commercial advisory role in their companies than before the recession.

The recession has also affected the way law firms charge. The hourly rate is now seen as just one tool among many billing structures, and 63% of clients reported seeing better value for money since the recession through add-ons such as free-of-charge secondees.

Two-thirds of General Counsel have demanded lower fee rates from their external lawyers. However, only one-quarter of partners are actually delivering reduced rates.

Bryan Hughes, chief executive at Eversheds, says: “When we conducted our first report into the legal sector, The 21st Century Law Firm, two years ago, we found that many law firm partners were resistant to change, despite their clients asking for it.

“For example, two years ago, only 22% of clients and 48% of partners saw value billing as a trend for the future. Now, 86% of clients and 88% of partners say they often or sometimes use value billing.

“As well as globalisation and the increased use of technology to deliver efficiency, the key change is the shift in power to the client, which is largely due to in-house counsel taking a more important commercial role within their companies. This will prove to be a real shake down for the legal sector and its workings, and law firms will need to really to prove their worth as in house teams expand their expertise.”

Law firms need to demonstrate how they can add value to a client’s in-house team, Hughes said.

“The change that was predicted to take place over the next ten years is here now, and it will be those firms who respond to the trends identified in the report who will see the real benefits.”

Richard Given, legal director, emerging markets, Cisco, says: “Firms cannot go on believing that the hourly rate is still an acceptable way of billing; the market is at a tipping point, and it is those who can address the change that will be the ‘next generation’.”
 

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll