header-logo header-logo

The House of Lords & the EU Withdrawal Bill (Pt 2)

23 February 2018 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7782 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
nlj_7782_zander_0

This week, Michael Zander considers retained EU law & modified powers

  • The Constitution Committee has called for changes regarding the Parliamentary procedures for passing the hundreds of statutory instruments that will be required.

The Constitution Committee’s report on the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (HL Paper 69, January 29, 2018) says: ‘[T]he creation of retained EU law by the Bill will introduce uncertainties and ambiguities into the law. These will be compounded if the Bill does not direct the courts clearly as to how they should go about the task of interpreting retained EU law.’ (para 125)

In regard to pre-exit retained EU law that has not been modified, clause 6(3) of the Bill provides that questions as to interpretation will be determined by reference to any retained case law and any retained general principles of EU law. Only the Supreme Court and the High Court of Justiciary in Scotland would be free to depart from pre-exit decisions of the European Court. In deciding whether

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll