header-logo header-logo

01 May 2026 / Roger Lush , Lara Elder
Issue: 8159 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

How big was the breakup?

248356
© Getty images

Roger Lush & Lara Elder examine the state of UK and EU trade mark law, ten years post-Brexit

  • Post-Brexit, UK and EU trade mark law remain broadly aligned, but evolving practices are leading to some divergence—particularly around bad faith filings and registrability standards.
  • ​Procedural differences between the UKIPO and EUIPO are increasingly significant, with the UKIPO adopting a more court-like, rigorous and interventionist approach, while the EUIPO remains largely administrative with minimal case management.

There have been no fundamental changes to trade mark law in the UK since Brexit. However, recent cases and procedural shifts are producing some meaningful differences in aspects of law and practice between the UK and EU.

When Brexit took effect on 1 January 2021, the UK retained EU law and jurisprudence in the field of trade marks. However, since the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 came into force in January 2024, the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court have had the power to overturn what was formerly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll