header-logo header-logo

01 May 2026 / Roger Lush , Lara Elder
Issue: 8159 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

How big was the breakup?

248356
© Getty images

Roger Lush & Lara Elder examine the state of UK and EU trade mark law, ten years post-Brexit

  • Post-Brexit, UK and EU trade mark law remain broadly aligned, but evolving practices are leading to some divergence—particularly around bad faith filings and registrability standards.
  • ​Procedural differences between the UKIPO and EUIPO are increasingly significant, with the UKIPO adopting a more court-like, rigorous and interventionist approach, while the EUIPO remains largely administrative with minimal case management.

There have been no fundamental changes to trade mark law in the UK since Brexit. However, recent cases and procedural shifts are producing some meaningful differences in aspects of law and practice between the UK and EU.

When Brexit took effect on 1 January 2021, the UK retained EU law and jurisprudence in the field of trade marks. However, since the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Act 2023 came into force in January 2024, the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court have had the power to overturn what was formerly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll