header-logo header-logo

01 June 2018 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7795 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

How builders can banish the covenant problem

nlj_7795_francis

As demand for housing rises, lawyers are deploying s 84 applications to overcome the barrier of restrictive covenants. Andrew Francis offers advice

  • Discharging or modifying restrictive covenants over freehold land. Using s 84(1) of the Law of Property Act 1925.
  • Why this is a useful jurisdiction now.

The importance of the jurisdiction under s 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925 cannot be overestimated. The government’s housing and new national planning policy framework seeks to release land for much needed housing. There is a new Garden City movement supported by the government. As it is economic to develop to a greater intensity, a policy generally favoured under planning law, land values warrant steps being taken to remove covenant problems. Finally, there has been a growth in the re-use of sites where obsolescent houses are suitable for demolition with either replacement houses, or a greater number of houses, or flats being built.

The barriers

In this context, restrictive covenants often act as a barrier to the carrying out of the policies

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll