header-logo header-logo

How the law came to support slavery

30 September 2020 / Satvinder S Juss
Issue: 7904 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law , Equality , Diversity , Human rights
printer mail-detail
28456
Satvinder Juss investigates the shocking legal justifications that were used to excuse slavery

In the aftermath of the toppling of the slaver Edward Colston’s statue in Bristol, we saw the ambivalence of those who applauded this as a pivotal moment in understanding the wealth of our cities and those who saw it as violation of a historic heritage. The ensuing controversy, however, obscured the ambivalence of the law, which is yet to be fully investigated in this much overlooked period of our history. The five men who, on 7 June 2020, allegedly unseated the statute from its plinth during a Black Lives Matter demonstration, and rolled it into Bristol harbour, are set to acquire unexpected fame. This is because they have been given cautions on the condition they give evidence to the Mayor of Bristol’s History Commission.

Cartwrights Case in 1569 was the first recorded case of a slave before the English courts, and concerned a slave from Russia. The court famously ruled that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll