header-logo header-logo

20 January 2011
Issue: 7449 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Human rights

O’Donoghue and others v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 34848/07, [2011] All ER (D) 46 (Jan)

Article 12 of the European Convention on Human Rights secured the fundamental right of a man and woman to marry and found a family. The exercise of the right to marry gave rise to social, personal and legal consequences; it was subject to national laws of the contracting states but the limitations, thereby introduced, had to not restrict or reduce the right in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right was impaired.

A blanket prohibition, without any attempt being made to investigate the genuineness of the proposed marriages, restricted the right to marry to such an extent that the very essence of the right was impaired. An application fee fixed at a level which a needy applicant could not afford could impair the essence of the right to marry.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll