header-logo header-logo

Human rights—Freedom of association—Employment

23 November 2012
Issue: 7539 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Redfearn v United Kingdom (App No 47335/06) [2012] All ER (D) 112 (Nov)

European Court of Human Rights, Judge Garlicki (President), Judges Björgvinsson, Bratza, Hirvelä, Nicolaou, Kalaydjieva, De Gaetano, and F Araci (Deputy Section Registrar), 6 Nov 2012

It is incumbent on the UK to take reasonable and appropriate measures to protect employees, including those with less than one year’s service, from dismissal on grounds of political opinion or affiliation, either through the creation of a further exception to the one-year qualifying period under the Employment Rights Act 1996 or through a freestanding claim for unlawful discrimination on grounds of political opinion or affiliation.

The applicant worked as a bus driver for a private company, S Ltd, which supplied services to a local authority. He was employed in December 2003. The majority of his passengers were Asian in origin. There were no complaints about his work or his conduct at work and his supervisor, who was of Asian origin, nominated him for the award of “first-class employee”. Following revelations in a local newspaper

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll