header-logo header-logo

10 July 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7660 / Categories: Features , Profession , Marketing
printer mail-detail

I never had the Latin…

Jon Robins takes issue with the poshness test

Are you posh enough to work here? Alan Milburn, the government’s so-called social mobility tsar, last month accused business of imposing a “poshness test” (his phrase) effectively excluding bright working class kids from the best jobs.

In his latest report, which involved a study of 13 top law, accountancy and financial services firms, it was revealed that seven out of 10 of job offers made last year to graduates went to those who had been to fee-paying or selective state schools. “Inevitably that ends up excluding youngsters who have the right sort of grades and abilities but whose parents do not have the right sort of bank balances,” said Milburn, who chairs the Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission.

The report records “a relatively dramatic decline” in the number of lawyers employed within these firms who were the first-generation in their family to go to university. More than four out of 10 trainees (41%) appointed by leading law firms were educated at private

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll