header-logo header-logo

10 July 2015 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7660 / Categories: Features , Profession , Marketing
printer mail-detail

I never had the Latin…

Jon Robins takes issue with the poshness test

Are you posh enough to work here? Alan Milburn, the government’s so-called social mobility tsar, last month accused business of imposing a “poshness test” (his phrase) effectively excluding bright working class kids from the best jobs.

In his latest report, which involved a study of 13 top law, accountancy and financial services firms, it was revealed that seven out of 10 of job offers made last year to graduates went to those who had been to fee-paying or selective state schools. “Inevitably that ends up excluding youngsters who have the right sort of grades and abilities but whose parents do not have the right sort of bank balances,” said Milburn, who chairs the Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission.

The report records “a relatively dramatic decline” in the number of lawyers employed within these firms who were the first-generation in their family to go to university. More than four out of 10 trainees (41%) appointed by leading law firms were educated at private

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll