header-logo header-logo

25 November 2016 / John Clargo
Issue: 7724 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

If it ain’t broke...

nlj_7724_clargo

Advising on compliance with break provisions in a lease is no easy matter, says John Clargo​

  • Works can trip you up when breaking a lease.
  • Check both the wording of licences and what has actually been done.

The interplay between tenants’ rent obligations and their ability to break the term of their leases has long been a topic of considerable interest to practitioners advising either landlords or tenants. Two cases in particular will have been high on the radar in advising clients before and after the exercise of a break clause.

In PCE Investors v Cancer Research UK [2012] EWHC 884 (Ch), [2012] All ER (D) 111 (Apr) Peter Smith J. held that to exercise a break clause falling between rent payment dates A and B validly, a tenant had to have paid all the rent lawfully due on date A. They were not entitled to apportion the relevant gale of rent by paying only for the period from date A to the break date. He suggested that instead of paying the reduced

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll