header-logo header-logo

Ignore now, pay later

12 February 2014 / Ewen Archibald , Masood Ahmed
Issue: 7594 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail
web_ahmed_archibold

Should defendants’ costs always be met by the claimants where proceedings are discontinued? Masood Ahmed & Ewen Archibald investigate

In reversing the county court judgment in Nelson’s Yard Management Company and Others v Ezrefula [2013] EWCA Civ 235; [2013] All ER (D) 216 (Mar)—a case which concerned the determination of costs in circumstances when proceedings are discontinued—the Court of Appeal underlined the importance of litigants obtaining legal advice at the earliest stage of a dispute. The case illustrates that conduct which litigants may think insignificant, or not think about at all, could cost them substantially at a later stage of the litigation process.

In Nelson’s Yard , the claimants had asked the court to disapply the presumption in CPR 38.6(1) that the defendants’ costs will be met by the claimants where proceedings are discontinued. This request was declined by the recorder and the grounds of appeal were that he had exceeded his considerable discretion in giving insufficient weight to issues

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Chester office

Slater Heelis—Chester office

North West presence strengthened with Chester office launch

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Cooke, Young & Keidan—Elizabeth Meade

Firm grows commercial disputes expertise with partner promotion

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

NEWS
The House of Lords has set up a select committee to examine assisted dying, which will delay the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
back-to-top-scroll