header-logo header-logo

Immigration

28 March 2013
Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Lord Carlile of Berriew & Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWCA Civ 199, [2013] All ER (D) 224 (Mar)

It was settled law that, where special expertise was required, the court had to grant a wide margin to the secretary of state’s decision in matters of national security and foreign policy and the court should not substitute its judgment for that of the secretary of state. The executive took responsibility for issues of national security and the handling of international relations and was democratically accountable for the merits of the decisions of Parliament. The court reserved to itself the responsibility for seeing that the decision complied with the law, was not irrational and complied strictly with procedural requirements. The secretary of state had accordingly been entitled to have regard to the welfare of the local staff and to the protection of British property in Tehran in refusing entry to the UK to a prominent Iranian dissident.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
Civil justice lurches onward with characteristic eccentricity. In his latest Civil Way column, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist, surveys a procedural landscape featuring 19-page bundle rules, digital possession claims, and rent laws he labels ‘bonkers’
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
back-to-top-scroll