header-logo header-logo

11 November 2010
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Immigration

R (on the application of Aitouaret) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] All ER (D) 06 (Nov)

On its true construction, s 36(1) of the UK Borders Act 2007 referred to persons who had served such periods of imprisonment as they were required to serve pursuant to a custodial sentence.

There could be no duality of detention: either the foreign national prisoner had served a term of imprisonment and was detained under s 36 of the Act, or he had not served a term of imprisonment and was still a serving prisoner.

The two could not overlap. Section 36 of the Act was concerned with the ability to keep a foreign national prisoner who had been sentenced to imprisonment for 12 months or longer in detention in circumstances where he might otherwise be released. Prior to that time, he had been a serving prisoner, so there was no need to exercise any power to detain under s 36.

The concern arose in circumstances where a foreign national prisoner was going to be released but the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll