header-logo header-logo

04 July 2014
Issue: 7613 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration—Asylum seeker—Freedom of religion

R (on the application of B) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2014] EWCA Civ 854; [2014] All ER (D) 183 (Jun)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Dyson MR, Moses and Patten LJJ, 24 June 2014

Removal to France of an asylum seeking minor who wished to wear a burqa, and her father, would not constitute a flagrant violation of the applicant’s rights under Arts 8 or 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights, despite the French ban on the burqa in public places.

Sibghat Kadri QC and Rashid Ahmed (instructed by Britannia Law Practice LLP) for the applicants. David Mankell (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the secretary of state. Satvinder Juss (instructed by HSBS Law Solicitors) appeared by way of written submissions for the Sikh Council Hampshire as intervener.

The applicants were a father and his daughter (born in 2002) who were Iranian nationals. Both were practising Muslims who believed that females should cover their heads in public. The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll