header-logo header-logo

14 January 2016
Issue: 7682 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Immigration Bill debate

Peers have expressed concern that the Immigration Bill does not define what constitutes a “genuine obstacle” to failed asylum seekers leaving the UK.

The Bill allows the home secretary to support asylum seekers who may become destitute only if they do not face a “genuine obstacle” to leaving the UK. However, the Bill leaves the definition of the term to secondary legislation.

In a report published last week, the House of Lords Constitution Committee called for the term to be defined in greater detail and in primary legislation so that it can be scrutinised by Parliament. They warned that Peers are being asked to legislate on a provision that will affect people in potentially desperate circumstances without a clear understanding of what the rules would mean in practice.

The committee also raises concerns about provisions to give the home secretary powers to overrule independent judicial decisions of the First-tier Immigration Tribunal on immigration bail conditions.

Issue: 7682 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

Gateley Legal—Billy Poulter & Shay Moore

North West residential development team welcomes partner and associate

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll