header-logo header-logo

Immigration—Deportation—National security

15 March 2012
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

W (Algeria) and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department; PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Z (Algeria) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8, [2012] All ER (D) 53 (Mar)

Supreme Court, Lord Philips P, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr, Lord Dyson and Lord Wilson SCJJ, 7 Mar 2012

The court considered the circumstances in which it is open to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) to make an order for an absolute and irreversible guarantee of total confidentiality in respect of a witness’s identity and evidence before that identity and evidence are disclosed to the Secretary of State.  

Michael Fordham QC and Stephanie Harrison (instructed by Luqmani Thompson & Partners, Birnberg Pierce & Partners and Tyndallwoods) for the appellants. Robin Tam QC and Robert Palmer (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.

The appellants were Algerian nationals. The Secretary of State for the Home Department decided to deport the appellants to Algeria on the basis that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll