header-logo header-logo

15 March 2012
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration—Deportation—National security

W (Algeria) and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department; PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Z (Algeria) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8, [2012] All ER (D) 53 (Mar)

Supreme Court, Lord Philips P, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr, Lord Dyson and Lord Wilson SCJJ, 7 Mar 2012

The court considered the circumstances in which it is open to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) to make an order for an absolute and irreversible guarantee of total confidentiality in respect of a witness’s identity and evidence before that identity and evidence are disclosed to the Secretary of State.  

Michael Fordham QC and Stephanie Harrison (instructed by Luqmani Thompson & Partners, Birnberg Pierce & Partners and Tyndallwoods) for the appellants. Robin Tam QC and Robert Palmer (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.

The appellants were Algerian nationals. The Secretary of State for the Home Department decided to deport the appellants to Algeria on the basis that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll