header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
15 March 2012
Issue: 7505 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration—Deportation—National security

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

W (Algeria) and another v Secretary of State for the Home Department; PP (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Z (Algeria) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8, [2012] All ER (D) 53 (Mar)

Supreme Court, Lord Philips P, Lord Brown, Lord Kerr, Lord Dyson and Lord Wilson SCJJ, 7 Mar 2012

The court considered the circumstances in which it is open to the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (SIAC) to make an order for an absolute and irreversible guarantee of total confidentiality in respect of a witness’s identity and evidence before that identity and evidence are disclosed to the Secretary of State.  

Michael Fordham QC and Stephanie Harrison (instructed by Luqmani Thompson & Partners, Birnberg Pierce & Partners and Tyndallwoods) for the appellants. Robin Tam QC and Robert Palmer (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State.

The appellants were Algerian nationals. The Secretary of State for the Home Department decided to deport the appellants to Algeria on the basis that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Chatbots in the dock as AI liability questions mount
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
NLJ this week: Corporate crackdown puts senior managers on notice
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
NLJ this week: Mazur ruling sparks fresh calls for litigation overhaul
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
NLJ this week: Hidden assets & financial remedies proceedings
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
NLJ this week: Deferred prosecution agreements enter a new era
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll