header-logo header-logo

24 July 2008
Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-detail

Immunity granted to police complainants

Legal news update

Anyone reporting an alleged crime to police cannot now be sued for defamation by the person they accuse from the moment they make the complaint, following a Court of Appeal ruling.

The decision in Westcott v Westcott arose after Worcestershire magistrate, Richard Westcott, tried to sue his former daughter-in-law, Dr Sarah Westcott, for slander and libel over allegations that he assaulted her and his baby grandson.

Last October, the High Court rejected his claim, saying her oral and written complaints to the police were protected by absolute privilege. Mr Westcott appealed, but the appeal court upheld the original judgment.

Matthew Brandis, a partner at B P Collins, which represented Dr Westcott, says it’s a significant decision because until now a person was only protected from a defamation claim once the police had begun to investigate an allegation and not at the time of the initial complaint.

He says: “This is a very important ruling and a victory for freedom of speech. It is everybody’s right to be able to make a complaint to the police without fear of being sued in relation to that complaint and now the Court of Appeal has made it crystal clear where the law stands.”

Issue: 7331 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll