header-logo header-logo

13 June 2019 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7844 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Imposters & confidence tricksters

Mark Solon sizes up the risks of making false statements: go directly to jail, do not pass go, & do not collect £350,000

Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith’s recent decision to close the trial of eight men accused of a £7m carbon credit investment fraud after discovering that expert witness Andrew Ager had no relevant qualifications and had used recycled his witness statements made me choke on my breakfast eggs.

The judge said: ‘Andrew Ager is not an expert of suitable calibre. He had little or no understanding of the duties of an expert. He had received no training and attended no courses. He has no academic qualifications.’ Sadly, he is not alone in the camp of ‘naughty’ experts.

A bundle of mistakes

An expert witness who makes a false statement in a report, without genuinely believing it to be true, can expect the court to commit them to prison for contempt. In Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd v Zafar [2019] EWCA Civ 392, [2019] All ER (D) 20 (Apr), the Court of Appeal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
Businesses are facing a ‘dramatic rise in prosecution risks’ as sweeping reforms to corporate criminal liability come into force, expanding the net of who can be held responsible for wrongdoing inside organisations
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
back-to-top-scroll