header-logo header-logo

Imposters & confidence tricksters

13 June 2019 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7844 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Mark Solon sizes up the risks of making false statements: go directly to jail, do not pass go, & do not collect £350,000

Judge Nicholas Loraine-Smith’s recent decision to close the trial of eight men accused of a £7m carbon credit investment fraud after discovering that expert witness Andrew Ager had no relevant qualifications and had used recycled his witness statements made me choke on my breakfast eggs.

The judge said: ‘Andrew Ager is not an expert of suitable calibre. He had little or no understanding of the duties of an expert. He had received no training and attended no courses. He has no academic qualifications.’ Sadly, he is not alone in the camp of ‘naughty’ experts.

A bundle of mistakes

An expert witness who makes a false statement in a report, without genuinely believing it to be true, can expect the court to commit them to prison for contempt. In Liverpool Victoria Insurance Co Ltd v Zafar [2019] EWCA Civ 392, [2019] All ER (D) 20 (Apr), the Court of Appeal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll