header-logo header-logo

Incentives to settle

14 March 2013
Issue: 7552 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

New costs rules to come into force next month

Rules encouraging parties to settle early, or risk paying out more if they lose, are due to come into force next month as part of the Jackson roll-out.

The Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) allows for an additional amount to be paid to a claimant by a defendant in cases where the defendant has refused the claimant’s offer to settle and the court has given judgment for the claimant which is at least as advantageous to the claimant as the claimant’s offer. Bringing this new regime into practice, The Offers to Settle in Civil Proceedings Order 2013 sets out the percentage of damages which a defendant may be ordered to pay out on top. In offers up to £500,000 this will be 10% of the amount of damages awarded; above £500,000 and up to £1m, it will be 10% of the first £500,000 and 5% of the damages awarded above £500,000; while, for amounts above £1m, the figures are 7.5% of the first £1m and 0.001% of the damages awarded above that figure.

Janna Purdie, of LexisPSL Dispute Resolution, said apparent discrepancies between the 2013 Order and Pt 36, CPR could be explained. “Pt 36 provides for 10% of the first £500,000 and 5% above, up to £1m, namely a composite rate of 7.5% for awards of £1m. The 0.001% required by the 2013 Order arose from a requirement to set a prescribed percentage in s 55(3) of LASPO. Following concern that a percentage of 0% or nil per cent would not comply with this requirement, 0.001% was set so that effectively no additional amount will be paid over £1m. The CPR Committee considered that, as, in practice, no percentage will apply to figures over £1m, it need not be addressed in Pt 36.”
 

Issue: 7552 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll