header-logo header-logo

22 February 2013
Issue: 7549 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Income tax

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Anson [2013] EWCA Civ 63, [2013] All ER (D) 123 (Feb)

The relevant test for determining whether a person was taxed on the same profits or income in both jurisdictions was whether the source of the profits or income in each jurisdiction was the same. Where the taxpayer became entitled to the profits of an entity because of some contractual arrangement to which he was a party, he had to show that the contract was actually the source of the profit, rather than a mechanism to secure a right to a profit derived from another source. That would in general mean that he had to show a proprietary right to the profits.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll