header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023 / Mark Solon
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Expert witnesses: Independent minds?

147349
Mark Solon explores some of the reasons why experts might feel compelled to forgo their overriding responsibilities to the court
  • Expert witnesses and solicitors must have a close professional relationship to work effectively together.
  • All expert reports must contain a statement that the expert understands and has complied with their duty to the court. 
  • Some disturbing data on the independence of expert witnesses and the way they work with instructing solicitors.

The Bond Solon Expert Witness Survey 2023, conducted in association with The Law Society Gazette, produced some disturbing data on the independence of expert witnesses and the way they work with instructing solicitors. Expert witnesses and solicitors must have a close professional relationship to work effectively together where there are issues in dispute in a matter that need expert opinion evidence.

The survey covers several important areas around this relationship, particularly around the concept of independence where, although an expert is paid by the instructing party, the duty of the expert is to the court. The survey

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll