header-logo header-logo

Expert witnesses: Independent minds?

24 November 2023 / Mark Solon
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail
147349
Mark Solon explores some of the reasons why experts might feel compelled to forgo their overriding responsibilities to the court
  • Expert witnesses and solicitors must have a close professional relationship to work effectively together.
  • All expert reports must contain a statement that the expert understands and has complied with their duty to the court. 
  • Some disturbing data on the independence of expert witnesses and the way they work with instructing solicitors.

The Bond Solon Expert Witness Survey 2023, conducted in association with The Law Society Gazette, produced some disturbing data on the independence of expert witnesses and the way they work with instructing solicitors. Expert witnesses and solicitors must have a close professional relationship to work effectively together where there are issues in dispute in a matter that need expert opinion evidence.

The survey covers several important areas around this relationship, particularly around the concept of independence where, although an expert is paid by the instructing party, the duty of the expert is to the court. The survey

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll