header-logo header-logo

24 November 2023 / Mark Solon
Issue: 8050 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Expert witnesses: Independent minds?

147349
Mark Solon explores some of the reasons why experts might feel compelled to forgo their overriding responsibilities to the court
  • Expert witnesses and solicitors must have a close professional relationship to work effectively together.
  • All expert reports must contain a statement that the expert understands and has complied with their duty to the court. 
  • Some disturbing data on the independence of expert witnesses and the way they work with instructing solicitors.

The Bond Solon Expert Witness Survey 2023, conducted in association with The Law Society Gazette, produced some disturbing data on the independence of expert witnesses and the way they work with instructing solicitors. Expert witnesses and solicitors must have a close professional relationship to work effectively together where there are issues in dispute in a matter that need expert opinion evidence.

The survey covers several important areas around this relationship, particularly around the concept of independence where, although an expert is paid by the instructing party, the duty of the expert is to the court. The survey

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll